How can this kind of people get FOUR MORE YEARS??
That’s because a lot of Americans are stupid.
If you look at the states that went to Bush – most are southern and mid-western states. States with lots of space and lots of space in people’s heads.
In my family, the three acknowledged “wise men” – my grandfather, me, and my brother who is a doctor, voted for Kerry. The rest of my family – my wife, my mom, my sister and her husband, my other brother (and his wife probably) voted for Bush.
immense sorrow. it’s disturbing to know that bush won the popular vote by millions. how scary to see the overwhelming redness in the middle of america.
Simply no hope for this country.
Bush’s voters , to certain extent , resemble HK’s DAB and Democrac Party’s voters — too simple , always naive — so they choose a candidate who behaves naive
This post has been removed by the author.
說下去之前, 容我先說一聲：God bless America.結果如此, 惟有接受事實, 尊重美國民眾的選擇 (當然不是所有民眾).事實再次證明, 政治是一場比現實更具真實性的利害遊戲,誰控制媒體, 誰控制企業, 便是政治上的可能勝利者.我已經在〈從《華氏911》閱讀美國〉一文已經說了有關的感受, 在此不贅.另外,不管怎麼樣也不能說”大多數美國人民(尤其是位於南部及中西部的)全是stupid”之類帶有歧視性標籤性的字眼. 一來對人家不公平(憑什麼如此武斷地說什麼人是愚蠢什麼人是聰明呢？我在〈從《華氏911》閱讀美國〉一文亦極其量說美國人大多是天真而已); 二來說出這樣的”抹黑”話語, 和小布殊”老屈”伊拉克在本質上又有什麼分別哩? 不單在解釋上流於簡單和片面, 更有”五十步笑百步”之嫌.
just like to say, “thy shall be done on Earth as in the Utopia”.
“Stupid” – is not discriminatory.
“Unwise” may be more appropriate.
Powered by WordPress and K2
Entries Feed and Comments Feed
49 queries. 0.507 seconds.