例如頭條日報,有阿嬌第一次記招,
便以「勇敢站出來」,「炒絲支持」來形容~
相反EDC的聲明便是「賤男形象已成」,「事業一舖清」~
對兩名當事人的描述可謂差天共地~有趣有趣~

我又會覺得，自己影係一回事(跟本冇諗過公開)，依家係不幸俾人公開左！
喊，俾人覺得扮弱者，唔知錯！
但俾人偷影又係一回事喎！唔可以相題並論！

問題正是因為我們批評某事情時，總喜歡新仇舊恨都算進去，甚至連當事人的背景（背後間公司給人的印象）都一併連上，那根本沒有議事論事的基礎，還用去討論？蘋果如是，拿拿君亦如是。

不如直跳到預設的結論：我對某某傳媒集團的大老闆好反感，所以一切他旗下的報刊／藝人我都好反感。

其實就算打了折，同行一樣可以互相批評的，只要討論時以事論事以理服人就可以。難道立法會議員就不可批評其他立法會議員，惠康就不可批評百佳嗎？最終看的還是立論，而不是出身背景。

至於作者你,係咪為生果報既同行工作既呢?
if yes,你都有conflict of interest,篇文可讀性起碼打個八折.

探討呢件事時唔好忽略佢背後間公司給人的印象也是令佢最為惹人反感既原因之一.

the people who are criticizing others severely are in fact having a very relaxed moral attitudes towards their own behaviors (searching for pics, intriding other ppl’s privacy)…a sure double-standard…the ones who accused that others are fake are in fact hypocrites themselves…or they are jealous of the money and fame that the gals are making from their biz (ignoring the sacrifice or the efforts that they put in their work)

as an adult, i don’t think she’s wrong to have her own private life after her “work”…it’s not fake to put on a “mask” if this is part of the “job”…to a certain extent, we all put on our “mask” in the workplace…as mature adults, we should understand that the job of the actors or singers are to “act” the role that their company assigned to them…it’s just a job to earn a bowl of rice…moreover, the companies or the persons involved may not verify the authenticity of the pics if it’ll lead to breaches of commercial contracts…it’s business…and why would some people need a clarification? is it really based on a moral need or are ppl using morality as an excuse to satisfy their curiosity?

the ppl who are wrong in this incident are those who put other ppl’s private pictures on the web…and those who put inappropriate moral blames or even personal attacks on these gals after looking at their private pics which are not meant to be shown in public …the only thing that is wrong with the gals in the pics is their lack of sense of security…they should know how to protect themselves…and not to let others taking pictures like these no matter what…

if we put ourselves into other ppl’s shoes….we’ll treat them with much more tolerance and acceptance…making this a better world for all…if gil has already came out and made a declaration, please give people a chance and let her go…..

True, Li’s editorial has a factual error. But his argument is still sound.

當然,被偷拍,就算只是洗澡,甚至食飯都會覺得不開心(不過她之前的確是高調、誇張了點),跟自己做甚麼會自拍好像沒有關係…… 只是,被偷拍到一件小事都哭成那個樣子,好像很委屈很難受,現在人家就會覺得反差太大,很難接受。　

畢竟,這件事上差不多整個香港都是受害者,不管是私隱、警權、自由、性觀念等,都使我們受到壓迫,成為了受害者。