<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The end of the affair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hoiking.org/2007/06/28/950/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hoiking.org/2007/06/28/950/</link>
	<description>只談老實私見。</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://blog.hoiking.org/2007/06/28/950/#comment-47888</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 05:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hoiking.org/2007/06/28/950/#comment-47888</guid>
		<description>dessyng：遲了回覆，甚抱歉。你所說的我大多同意，不過你說《泰晤士報》「仍是銷量最佳」，我則有回疑惑：若以broadsheet而言，不是Daily Telegraph銷量（純以數字來計）比The Times多麼？如果有誤，請賜教，謝謝！</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dessyng：遲了回覆，甚抱歉。你所說的我大多同意，不過你說《泰晤士報》「仍是銷量最佳」，我則有回疑惑：若以broadsheet而言，不是Daily Telegraph銷量（純以數字來計）比The Times多麼？如果有誤，請賜教，謝謝！</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dessyng</title>
		<link>http://blog.hoiking.org/2007/06/28/950/#comment-47778</link>
		<dc:creator>dessyng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hoiking.org/2007/06/28/950/#comment-47778</guid>
		<description>You quoted from Daily Telegraph and Independent.   

But to date the Times is still the best-selling paper in the UK.  It is what they said, 'There is a beautiful simplicity to the transfer of political power in this country......The episode was peaceful to the point of serene.  In much of the globe power is still dependent on the barrel of a gun not symbolic kissing of hands.  It has become fashionable in certain quarters to mock the virtues and the values of bourgeous democracy.'

Another act is going to play: I'll try my utmost or Floreat Etona?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You quoted from Daily Telegraph and Independent.   </p>
<p>But to date the Times is still the best-selling paper in the UK.  It is what they said, &#8216;There is a beautiful simplicity to the transfer of political power in this country&#8230;&#8230;The episode was peaceful to the point of serene.  In much of the globe power is still dependent on the barrel of a gun not symbolic kissing of hands.  It has become fashionable in certain quarters to mock the virtues and the values of bourgeous democracy.&#8217;</p>
<p>Another act is going to play: I&#8217;ll try my utmost or Floreat Etona?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dessyng</title>
		<link>http://blog.hoiking.org/2007/06/28/950/#comment-47777</link>
		<dc:creator>dessyng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hoiking.org/2007/06/28/950/#comment-47777</guid>
		<description>Okie I agree that men are addicted to power.  But if Mr Gordon Brown did not agree with that, there is almost no chance for him to be PM for he is a scotch and does not come from Oxbridge.  If he were the leader ten years ago, Labour wouldn't come into power.  Even though he knew that men are addicted to power he still had to accept that agreement.  Did he have a choice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okie I agree that men are addicted to power.  But if Mr Gordon Brown did not agree with that, there is almost no chance for him to be PM for he is a scotch and does not come from Oxbridge.  If he were the leader ten years ago, Labour wouldn&#8217;t come into power.  Even though he knew that men are addicted to power he still had to accept that agreement.  Did he have a choice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
