Comments on: MJ，冇罪！ http://blog.hoiking.org/2005/06/14/387/ 只談老實私見。 Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:05:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Alex http://blog.hoiking.org/2005/06/14/387/comment-page-1/#comment-788 Alex Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:24:30 +0000 http://blog.hoiking.org/?p=387#comment-788 Carl：「無罪」（Not guilty）當然不等於「清白」（Innocent），正如大部分什會覺得，MJ一定搞過細路，只是在這宗案件中，控方從來未有拿出實物證據，未能完全說服陪審團，正因為此，疑點利益當然歸於被告，再加上十項控罪，都要十二名陪審員一致贊成才能將MJ定罪，所以當然判MJ無罪．．．． 只是不明白為何Tom Sneddom追著MJ多年不放！ Carl：「無罪」（Not guilty）當然不等於「清白」（Innocent），正如大部分什會覺得，MJ一定搞過細路，只是在這宗案件中，控方從來未有拿出實物證據，未能完全說服陪審團，正因為此，疑點利益當然歸於被告，再加上十項控罪，都要十二名陪審員一致贊成才能將MJ定罪，所以當然判MJ無罪．．．．

只是不明白為何Tom Sneddom追著MJ多年不放！

]]> By: Carl http://blog.hoiking.org/2005/06/14/387/comment-page-1/#comment-786 Carl Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:30:15 +0000 http://blog.hoiking.org/?p=387#comment-786 I don't think MJ is completely innocent, but it's widely reported that the DA "jumped the gun" to press charges. I don’t think MJ is completely innocent, but it’s widely reported that the DA “jumped the gun” to press charges.

]]> By: 小奧 http://blog.hoiking.org/2005/06/14/387/comment-page-1/#comment-785 小奧 Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:39:44 +0000 http://blog.hoiking.org/?p=387#comment-785 無論如何,他不用死在牢獄裡是幸運的 無論如何,他不用死在牢獄裡是幸運的

]]> By: 28481k http://blog.hoiking.org/2005/06/14/387/comment-page-1/#comment-784 28481k Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:35:20 +0000 http://blog.hoiking.org/?p=387#comment-784 As expected, since the evidence is so scarce, and I believe many of the jury are or were MJ's fans... As expected, since the evidence is so scarce, and I believe many of the jury are or were MJ’s fans…

]]> By: 冬冬 http://blog.hoiking.org/2005/06/14/387/comment-page-1/#comment-783 冬冬 Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:12:28 +0000 http://blog.hoiking.org/?p=387#comment-783 boooo... boooo…

]]>